Walkabout London – poor & white means disadvantage

Poor and white in London means disadvantage and no representation

I blog my views in brief articles I expect activists to challenge here and on social media. I can and will support my arguments with research and witness statements. In London, self-serving diversities push forward educated and smart political players to serve their communities rather than common good.

I’m staggered by the organisation of apoplectic communities that occupy London’s political space. My investigation in several boroughs showed me minorities and BME majorities cooperating but also competing with their peers. Often, white groups opposed to the status quo aren’t peers and suffer suspicion and exclusion similar to immigrant groups of yesteryear—a shameful reversal of fortunes.

My impression is ideological ‘pogroms’ exist in many constituencies where the poorest white working class residents feel marginalised. In London, the children of poor whites often fail in school, but are their failures of lesser importance?

I also get the impression poor vocal whites are browbeaten using race agitation and lost the will to fight back. Many whites exist in disorganised communities without representation. Given the rise of National Socialism and white nationalism in the UK, it’s a recipe for disaster—the Left doesn’t represent poor white Londoners.

The bigotry and racism in competing cultures are obvious, but angry and white, watch out. Protests get you branded racist—even if you’re right. If what I see in London is prevalent and repeated in other cities, it’s no surprise that fascism and white nationalism will dominate the conversation until overbearing Marxist-Socialist BME Radicals, Islamists and their white supporters may ‘get the government they deserve’.

Albeit, a white nationalist government is most unlikely in Britain because of a strong parliamentary democracy, two-party-system and little or no chance of proportional representation demanded by marginalised groups.

The Race and Equalities Commission must address divisive and hateful rhetoric from Left and Right political movements that provoke unprecedented disunity and violence in our small kingdom. White Britons must refute politically motivated allegations that our modern British state and most Britons are racists that oppress immigrants because of ethnicity and/or creed.

A step-change is possible

The evolution of civil and human rights law in our parliamentary democracy make those claims spurious. I find it reprehensible our political establishment is polarised on these issues. There is cultural bias and privilege in all our groups, but Britain’s legislature consistently delivers an improving civil and human rights backdrop—equality before the law and equal opportunities is failing on the altar of progressive universalism.

Marxism has form

The future looks bleak if Marxists-Socialists (or progressives? Pinkos?) can buy voters with open borders, dependencies, and take control of major cities. Demand and force more devolution. That’s the plan I heard from many Lefty activists in two hemispheres. One city at a time, under the cover of civil and human rights. I saw it happen in South America, where politics and organised crime enjoy marriages of convenience at grassroots.

Some cartels, especially ‘bankers,’ enjoy “real cash reserves” greater than some states and are powerful enough to inform governments. Help form undemocratic “socialist” drug and human trafficking governments in parts of South and Central America.  I write often demanding the US is not be complicit with Chinese infiltration. 

The United States of America told our future—if we suffered a “Bulldog Batten” and white nationalist politics, American Marxists and the Left gave us fair warning of what comes next. Would our state and institutions prove robust enough to defeat authoritarian and/or ethnocentric governance, and are local governments and law enforcement doing enough to defeat Left and Right wing revolutionary movements growing in various regions?

Cultural relativism is dissimulation

An example of confirmation bias and misguided opinions championed by globalist and Lefty cliques that dominate academic and social space would not go amiss: An academic/political globalist machine publish, cite and churn misinformation bearing little resemblance to the truth. Academics use their positions like unelected officials and social organisations employ pet academics to fight against home-truths from knowledgeable professionals like Trevor Philips:

“The Young Foundation has devoted itself to fighting inequality through trailblazing research and by working with communities. Their ethos of ‘doing with’ people—rather than people ‘being done to’—is vital. They have a cracking track record of creating and supporting the scaling-up of social innovations that have really made a difference to people’s lives.”

Lord John Bird, Editor-in-Chief, the Big Issue.

You can find an example of the Young Foundation’s trailblasing research in a document titled: “North East London: a case study of globalisation.”  Trevor Philips is once again their quoted “whipping coconut and traitor”. They rebuttal Philips using an Oxford psychologist and Young Foundation Fellow called Miles Hewstone:

“Hewstone explored what happens to relationships between distinct groups in conflict areas. His research—in Northern Ireland, former Yugoslavia and areas of Hindu-Muslim conflict in India—has established that when people have more contact with people from other backgrounds, understanding increases and hostility reduces. This challenges the more popularly accepted (within the UK) ‘threat’ theory, which proposes that more diversity leads to more misunderstanding and competition and increased prejudice. Hewstone’s work suggests the opposite.”

Need I describe escalating conflicts between Scottish Catholic Nationalists and Protestant Unionists or Islamists and Hindu nationalists in India? India is one of the oldest religious multicultural societies in the world—how’s that working out? I see empires frag on thr streets of London. Current affairs make Hewstone’s views laughable. Sure, many moderate folk coexist in most regions of the world, but my lived experiences in two hemispheres tell me very different stories.

Cultural diffusion

Multiculturalism taken to extremes culminates in competition. Multiculturalism that welcomes countercultures and demands cultural relativism for coexistence invites disruption that ultimately grows opposition to modern British ethics and values.